PFN Impact · 2025 Season
College Tight End Impact Rankings
Season
Week
| # | Details | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 86.5 | Houston | 651 | 5 | 65 | 83 | 4.1 | 78.3% | 0.34 | 49 | 12 | 1.41 | ||
| 2 | 85.1 | Vanderbilt | 769 | 4 | 62 | 85 | 6.1 | 72.9% | 0.57 | 35 | 12 | 3.70 | ||
| 3 | 84.5 | Utah | 514 | 5 | 42 | 68 | 5.2 | 61.8% | 0.46 | 56 | 12 | 3.89 | ||
| 4 | 84.0 | Baylor | 694 | 6 | 50 | 85 | 4.5 | 58.8% | 0.39 | 37 | 11 | 5.12 | ||
| 5 | 83.9 | Stanford | 545 | 2 | 49 | 80 | 6.5 | 61.3% | -0.16 | 50 | 12 | 5.06 | ||
| 6 | 83.5 | BYU | 500 | 3 | 37 | 49 | 7.0 | 75.5% | 0.31 | 63 | 13 | 4.79 | ||
| 7 | 82.7 | Texas Tech | 552 | 5 | 46 | 64 | 7.5 | 71.9% | 0.23 | 52 | 12 | 1.58 | ||
| 8 | 82.6 | Boston College | 489 | 2 | 48 | 70 | 3.6 | 68.6% | 0.13 | 50 | 12 | 4.29 | ||
| 9 | 82.5 | Duke | 404 | 5 | 34 | 42 | 7.3 | 81.0% | 1.12 | 59 | 13 | 3.43 | ||
| 10 | 82.4 | Temple | 483 | 6 | 30 | 42 | 7.1 | 71.4% | 0.83 | 62 | 12 | -1.11 | ||
| 11 | 82.2 | Oregon | 490 | 8 | 40 | 51 | 5.2 | 78.4% | 0.72 | 50 | 11 | 3.22 | ||
| 12 | 82.1 | Air Force | 370 | 6 | 21 | 30 | 8.9 | 70.0% | 1.16 | 64 | 12 | -4.51 | ||
| 13 | 81.8 | North Carolina St. | 468 | 7 | 47 | 67 | 3.7 | 70.1% | 0.18 | 42 | 11 | 5.85 | ||
| 14 | 81.2 | Syracuse | 412 | 0 | 39 | 56 | 4.3 | 69.6% | 0.01 | 49 | 12 | 6.79 | ||
| 15 | 81.1 | Notre Dame | 482 | 0 | 32 | 44 | 5.8 | 72.7% | 0.30 | 51 | 12 | 4.39 | ||
| 16 | 80.9 | Tulsa | 528 | 7 | 37 | 50 | 8.2 | 74.0% | 0.87 | 50 | 11 | -5.30 | ||
| 17 | 80.8 | Arkansas | 519 | 4 | 19 | 25 | 12.1 | 76.0% | 1.42 | 30 | 12 | 7.58 | ||
| 18 | 80.7 | Louisiana Tech | 440 | 0 | 37 | 46 | 6.0 | 80.4% | 0.21 | 61 | 12 | -6.88 | ||
| 19 | 80.7 | USC | 450 | 4 | 30 | 49 | 6.2 | 61.2% | 0.35 | 48 | 12 | 5.18 | ||
| 20 | 80.6 | Mississippi | 489 | 4 | 30 | 46 | 11.0 | 65.2% | 0.50 | 41 | 12 | 3.16 | ||
| 21 | 80.6 | Indiana | 316 | 2 | 25 | 28 | 8.3 | 89.3% | 0.73 | 63 | 13 | 2.66 | ||
| 22 | 80.6 | New Mexico | 545 | 4 | 53 | 73 | 6.2 | 72.6% | 0.10 | 35 | 12 | -4.55 | ||
| 23 | 80.5 | Wisconsin | 398 | 4 | 30 | 49 | 5.6 | 61.2% | 0.33 | 38 | 12 | 9.68 | ||
| 24 | 80.2 | Mississippi St. | 358 | 5 | 34 | 47 | 6.3 | 72.3% | 0.39 | 43 | 12 | 6.81 | ||
| 25 | 80.2 | Kansas St. | 389 | 6 | 38 | 58 | 5.7 | 65.5% | 0.30 | 43 | 11 | 3.56 | ||
| 26 | 80.0 | Ohio St. | 448 | 2 | 43 | 54 | 5.2 | 79.6% | 0.25 | 45 | 13 | 3.39 | ||
| 27 | 79.9 | Arizona St. | 375 | 4 | 38 | 50 | 6.0 | 76.0% | 0.31 | 42 | 12 | 5.16 | ||
| 28 | 79.8 | Oklahoma | 511 | 0 | 40 | 53 | 6.6 | 75.5% | 0.22 | 36 | 12 | 6.10 | ||
| 29 | 79.8 | Rutgers | 236 | 0 | 26 | 37 | 8.2 | 70.3% | 0.15 | 61 | 11 | 5.45 | ||
| 30 | 79.7 | Marshall | 387 | 3 | 36 | 47 | 3.1 | 76.6% | 0.26 | 56 | 12 | -3.24 | ||
| 31 | 79.6 | Alabama | 341 | 4 | 30 | 42 | 7.7 | 71.4% | 0.61 | 45 | 10 | 5.29 | ||
| 32 | 79.3 | Nebraska | 306 | 2 | 28 | 35 | 6.3 | 80.0% | 0.62 | 52 | 12 | 2.51 | ||
| 33 | 79.2 | LSU | 353 | 5 | 29 | 46 | 5.6 | 63.0% | 0.10 | 44 | 10 | 7.04 | ||
| 34 | 79.2 | Texas | 311 | 2 | 28 | 41 | 5.2 | 68.3% | 0.12 | 52 | 12 | 4.79 | ||
| 35 | 79.2 | Nevada | 374 | 2 | 35 | 48 | 5.9 | 72.9% | 0.17 | 56 | 12 | -4.42 | ||
| 36 | 79.1 | Boston College | 313 | 4 | 24 | 40 | 3.9 | 60.0% | 0.27 | 50 | 12 | 4.29 | ||
| 37 | 79.0 | Kansas | 450 | 5 | 36 | 45 | 6.3 | 80.0% | 0.64 | 33 | 12 | 4.72 | ||
| 38 | 78.7 | Bowling Green | 466 | 2 | 37 | 57 | 7.3 | 64.9% | 0.34 | 44 | 12 | -5.21 | ||
| 39 | 78.6 | TCU | 300 | 2 | 32 | 38 | 4.7 | 84.2% | 0.55 | 46 | 12 | 4.89 | ||
| 40 | 78.6 | UCF | 523 | 5 | 43 | 60 | 7.5 | 71.7% | 0.23 | 19 | 11 | 3.31 | ||
| 41 | 78.6 | Florida | 254 | 2 | 30 | 46 | 3.2 | 65.2% | -0.19 | 49 | 12 | 6.60 | ||
| 42 | 78.5 | Georgia | 245 | 1 | 19 | 26 | 7.5 | 73.1% | 0.38 | 55 | 13 | 4.47 | ||
| 43 | 78.4 | Iowa St. | 446 | 6 | 37 | 51 | 3.7 | 72.5% | 0.36 | 31 | 12 | 3.74 | ||
| 44 | 78.4 | SMU | 351 | 4 | 29 | 40 | 5.2 | 72.5% | 0.38 | 46 | 12 | 2.29 | ||
| 45 | 78.4 | Michigan St. | 359 | 3 | 36 | 44 | 4.4 | 81.8% | 0.52 | 37 | 12 | 4.14 | ||
| 46 | 78.3 | Florida St. | 208 | 2 | 23 | 35 | 2.7 | 65.7% | 0.17 | 55 | 9 | 4.85 | ||
| 47 | 78.3 | Cincinnati | 416 | 4 | 29 | 33 | 8.9 | 87.9% | 0.92 | 37 | 12 | 3.08 | ||
| 48 | 78.3 | Arkansas | 296 | 2 | 21 | 32 | 5.9 | 65.6% | 0.45 | 45 | 12 | 7.58 | ||
| 49 | 78.2 | Kentucky | 195 | 2 | 17 | 27 | 6.1 | 63.0% | 0.29 | 54 | 11 | 6.85 | ||
| 50 | 78.2 | New Mexico St. | 514 | 1 | 36 | 65 | 5.5 | 55.4% | 0.34 | 40 | 12 | -6.26 |
1–50 of 296
Page 1 of 6
How Tight End Impact is scored — College TE Impact (TE+) blends receiving production and efficiency (yards, TDs, YAC over expected, target share) with pass- and run-blocking, into a single-number grade.
College Tight End Impact (TE+) — a single-number season grade from PFN's college model. Toggle Compare to line up two TE seasons. Full methodology →