PFN Impact · 2025 Season
College Quarterback Impact Rankings
Season
Week
| # | Details | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 94.8 | Vanderbilt | 71.2% | 3,192 | 27 | 8 | 266.0 | 9.1 | 826 | 9 | 242 | 340 | 12 | 3.70 | ||
| 2 | 93.3 | Indiana | 71.5% | 2,980 | 33 | 6 | 229.2 | 9.1 | 240 | 6 | 226 | 316 | 13 | 2.66 | ||
| 3 | 93.1 | USC | 66.2% | 3,431 | 23 | 8 | 285.9 | 9.0 | 150 | 6 | 247 | 373 | 12 | 5.18 | ||
| 4 | 90.8 | Ohio St. | 78.4% | 3,323 | 31 | 6 | 255.6 | 9.1 | -2 | 0 | 279 | 356 | 13 | 3.39 | ||
| 5 | 90.3 | Mississippi | 65.5% | 3,016 | 18 | 3 | 251.3 | 8.9 | 470 | 6 | 218 | 333 | 12 | 3.16 | ||
| 6 | 90.1 | Navy | 61.8% | 1,390 | 9 | 5 | 139.0 | 10.4 | 1,040 | 14 | 81 | 131 | 10 | -2.94 | ||
| 7 | 89.4 | Air Force | 62.5% | 1,294 | 9 | 5 | 129.4 | 10.4 | 922 | 13 | 75 | 120 | 10 | -4.51 | ||
| 8 | 88.8 | USF | 66.3% | 3,158 | 28 | 7 | 263.2 | 9.0 | 1,008 | 14 | 226 | 341 | 12 | -2.38 | ||
| 9 | 88.5 | Utah | 63.7% | 2,180 | 22 | 5 | 198.2 | 7.1 | 687 | 7 | 193 | 303 | 11 | 3.89 | ||
| 10 | 88.2 | Cincinnati | 61.6% | 2,800 | 27 | 5 | 233.3 | 8.2 | 580 | 9 | 207 | 336 | 12 | 3.08 | ||
| 11 | 88.2 | Duke | 67.9% | 3,646 | 30 | 5 | 280.5 | 7.8 | -53 | 1 | 305 | 449 | 13 | 3.43 | ||
| 12 | 88.0 | Georgia | 70.7% | 2,691 | 23 | 5 | 207.0 | 7.4 | 442 | 8 | 251 | 355 | 13 | 4.47 | ||
| 13 | 87.8 | Washington | 70.0% | 2,850 | 21 | 8 | 237.5 | 8.1 | 595 | 6 | 231 | 330 | 12 | 3.49 | ||
| 14 | 86.7 | UNLV | 66.1% | 3,275 | 23 | 8 | 251.9 | 8.0 | 621 | 9 | 256 | 387 | 13 | -6.76 | ||
| 15 | 86.7 | Texas St. | 71.3% | 3,050 | 18 | 7 | 254.2 | 8.9 | 692 | 16 | 234 | 328 | 12 | -4.21 | ||
| 16 | 86.6 | Connecticut | 69.0% | 3,446 | 28 | 1 | 287.2 | 8.1 | 131 | 3 | 285 | 413 | 12 | -6.92 | ||
| 17 | 86.6 | Tulane | 62.4% | 2,862 | 14 | 6 | 220.2 | 7.9 | 610 | 16 | 222 | 356 | 13 | -2.15 | ||
| 18 | 86.5 | Florida St. | 58.3% | 2,760 | 15 | 9 | 230.0 | 8.7 | 557 | 9 | 180 | 309 | 12 | 4.85 | ||
| 19 | 86.4 | Georgia Tech | 71.7% | 2,697 | 12 | 5 | 245.2 | 8.2 | 922 | 15 | 230 | 321 | 11 | 2.35 | ||
| 20 | 86.2 | North Texas | 70.2% | 4,129 | 31 | 7 | 317.6 | 9.6 | 71 | 5 | 292 | 416 | 13 | -5.38 | ||
| 21 | 86.0 | TCU | 65.9% | 3,472 | 29 | 13 | 289.3 | 8.1 | 4 | 2 | 272 | 413 | 12 | 4.89 | ||
| 22 | 85.9 | Oregon | 72.5% | 2,733 | 24 | 6 | 227.8 | 8.4 | 191 | 1 | 227 | 313 | 12 | 3.22 | ||
| 23 | 85.9 | Notre Dame | 66.6% | 2,741 | 24 | 6 | 228.4 | 9.1 | 33 | 3 | 195 | 293 | 12 | 4.39 | ||
| 24 | 85.6 | Illinois | 68.1% | 2,811 | 21 | 5 | 234.3 | 7.8 | 188 | 4 | 226 | 332 | 12 | 5.49 | ||
| 25 | 85.4 | Alabama | 64.3% | 3,268 | 26 | 5 | 251.4 | 7.2 | 98 | 2 | 275 | 428 | 13 | 5.29 | ||
| 26 | 85.0 | Tennessee | 66.8% | 3,444 | 24 | 10 | 287.0 | 8.6 | 104 | 3 | 258 | 386 | 12 | 3.22 | ||
| 27 | 84.9 | Arkansas | 60.7% | 2,714 | 19 | 11 | 226.2 | 7.7 | 777 | 8 | 198 | 326 | 12 | 7.58 | ||
| 28 | 84.7 | Boise St. | 59.1% | 2,283 | 18 | 7 | 228.3 | 7.6 | 80 | 4 | 169 | 286 | 10 | -2.40 | ||
| 29 | 84.6 | North Carolina St. | 69.6% | 2,884 | 23 | 9 | 240.3 | 7.4 | 215 | 5 | 259 | 372 | 12 | 5.85 | ||
| 30 | 84.2 | BYU | 64.2% | 2,708 | 14 | 6 | 208.3 | 7.5 | 527 | 11 | 224 | 349 | 13 | 4.79 | ||
| 31 | 84.2 | Old Dominion | 59.7% | 2,624 | 21 | 10 | 218.7 | 8.8 | 1,007 | 13 | 173 | 290 | 12 | -3.36 | ||
| 32 | 84.2 | Army | 50.7% | 504 | 3 | 2 | 45.8 | 7.2 | 1,078 | 15 | 35 | 69 | 11 | -4.21 | ||
| 33 | 83.6 | Houston | 63.9% | 2,475 | 21 | 9 | 206.3 | 7.4 | 644 | 11 | 204 | 319 | 12 | 1.41 | ||
| 34 | 83.6 | Arizona | 64.2% | 2,963 | 26 | 5 | 246.9 | 7.2 | 149 | 3 | 247 | 385 | 12 | 2.89 | ||
| 35 | 83.6 | Texas A&M | 61.8% | 2,932 | 25 | 10 | 244.3 | 8.5 | 466 | 6 | 209 | 338 | 12 | 3.91 | ||
| 36 | 83.3 | Miami (FL) | 74.7% | 3,072 | 25 | 10 | 256.0 | 8.6 | 39 | 1 | 263 | 352 | 12 | 3.70 | ||
| 37 | 83.1 | Texas | 61.4% | 2,942 | 24 | 7 | 245.2 | 7.6 | 244 | 8 | 227 | 370 | 12 | 4.79 | ||
| 38 | 83.0 | East Carolina | 65.9% | 3,300 | 19 | 6 | 275.0 | 7.9 | 181 | 9 | 269 | 408 | 12 | -2.63 | ||
| 39 | 82.7 | Memphis | 69.7% | 2,567 | 15 | 6 | 213.9 | 6.8 | 618 | 9 | 239 | 343 | 12 | -3.88 | ||
| 40 | 82.4 | Delaware | 62.9% | 3,507 | 22 | 7 | 292.3 | 7.0 | 231 | 10 | 303 | 482 | 12 | -6.30 | ||
| 41 | 82.2 | Rutgers | 62.2% | 3,124 | 20 | 7 | 260.3 | 7.9 | -26 | 4 | 229 | 368 | 12 | 5.45 | ||
| 42 | 82.1 | Kansas | 62.1% | 2,531 | 22 | 7 | 210.9 | 7.4 | 404 | 4 | 198 | 319 | 12 | 4.72 | ||
| 43 | 82.0 | Baylor | 60.3% | 3,681 | 31 | 12 | 306.8 | 7.0 | 17 | 3 | 304 | 504 | 12 | 5.12 | ||
| 44 | 81.9 | Utah St. | 60.3% | 2,687 | 18 | 4 | 223.9 | 7.4 | 733 | 9 | 202 | 335 | 12 | -2.46 | ||
| 45 | 81.9 | Marshall | 66.8% | 2,043 | 17 | 5 | 185.7 | 7.8 | 660 | 6 | 171 | 256 | 11 | -3.24 | ||
| 46 | 81.7 | Louisiana | 58.9% | 1,324 | 10 | 6 | 120.4 | 7.0 | 627 | 9 | 106 | 180 | 11 | -4.32 | ||
| 47 | 81.6 | SMU | 66.1% | 3,363 | 26 | 10 | 280.3 | 7.5 | 50 | 4 | 279 | 422 | 12 | 2.29 | ||
| 48 | 81.6 | Kennesaw St. | 66.8% | 2,385 | 18 | 6 | 216.8 | 8.9 | 376 | 7 | 171 | 256 | 11 | -4.88 | ||
| 49 | 81.4 | Kansas St. | 59.8% | 2,385 | 18 | 6 | 198.8 | 6.8 | 477 | 8 | 204 | 341 | 12 | 3.56 | ||
| 50 | 81.3 | Syracuse | 62.8% | 1,317 | 10 | 2 | 329.3 | 7.9 | -33 | 1 | 98 | 156 | 4 | 6.79 |
1–50 of 190
Page 1 of 4
How Quarterback Impact is scored — College QB Impact (QBi) blends passing and rushing efficiency, production (yards, TDs, avoiding turnovers), situational play (close-game snaps, third/fourth-down conversion, designed rushing) and strength of schedule into a single-number grade.
College Quarterback Impact (QB+) — a single-number season grade from PFN's college model. Toggle Compare to line up two QB seasons. Full methodology →