PFN Impact · 2025 Season
College Defensive Tackle Impact Rankings
Season
Week
| # | Details | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 96.4 | Miami (OH) | 652 | 66 | 9 | 17.4% | 59 | 4 | 29 | 15 | 13 | -5.11 | ||
| 2 | 87.5 | New Mexico St. | 474 | 37 | 6 | 13.9% | 42 | 6 | 12 | 11 | 11 | -6.26 | ||
| 3 | 86.4 | Arkansas | 616 | 35 | 8 | 11.8% | 44 | 7 | 12 | 9 | 12 | 7.58 | ||
| 4 | 85.9 | Oklahoma | 408 | 24 | 2 | 9.8% | 42 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 6.10 | ||
| 5 | 85.7 | Tulane | 569 | 39 | 5 | 11.8% | 31 | 5 | 17 | 5 | 13 | -2.15 | ||
| 6 | 85.6 | Notre Dame | 307 | 21 | 1 | 12.3% | 21 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 4.39 | ||
| 7 | 85.0 | Air Force | 492 | 38 | 1 | 14.1% | 36 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 12 | -4.51 | ||
| 8 | 84.8 | Hawaii | 466 | 42 | 6 | 15.7% | 31 | 4 | 12 | 7 | 11 | -5.21 | ||
| 9 | 84.5 | Duke | 548 | 30 | 3 | 9.9% | 39 | 8 | 10 | 4 | 13 | 3.43 | ||
| 10 | 84.3 | Texas Tech | 478 | 33 | 5 | 11.3% | 34 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 13 | 1.58 | ||
| 11 | 83.7 | Miami (FL) | 338 | 24 | 5 | 12.9% | 23 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 3.70 | ||
| 12 | 83.4 | Florida St. | 329 | 24 | 7 | 13.2% | 31 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 12 | 4.85 | ||
| 13 | 83.1 | Navy | 599 | 30 | 7 | 9.4% | 54 | 4 | 11 | 8 | 11 | -2.94 | ||
| 14 | 82.9 | Oklahoma | 370 | 26 | 4 | 11.7% | 31 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 6.10 | ||
| 15 | 82.7 | Notre Dame | 293 | 26 | 1 | 12.1% | 12 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 11 | 4.39 | ||
| 16 | 82.6 | Mississippi | 548 | 30 | 5 | 10.3% | 44 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 12 | 3.16 | ||
| 17 | 82.4 | Virginia Tech | 449 | 20 | 5 | 8.9% | 47 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 12 | 5.83 | ||
| 18 | 82.2 | Duke | 477 | 23 | 4 | 9.5% | 37 | 2 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 3.43 | ||
| 19 | 82.1 | Kentucky | 491 | 26 | 4 | 10.4% | 32 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 12 | 6.85 | ||
| 20 | 82.0 | Louisville | 514 | 25 | 2 | 8.0% | 29 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 12 | 3.81 | ||
| 21 | 82.0 | Maryland | 548 | 25 | 2 | 9.2% | 33 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 2.43 | ||
| 22 | 81.9 | Texas A&M | 422 | 16 | 2 | 6.4% | 45 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 3.91 | ||
| 23 | 81.9 | Texas Tech | 443 | 25 | 3 | 8.9% | 34 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 13 | 1.58 | ||
| 24 | 81.7 | Georgia Tech | 495 | 27 | 3 | 9.9% | 42 | 9 | 8 | 3 | 12 | 2.35 | ||
| 25 | 81.6 | Kansas St. | 482 | 30 | 2 | 11.2% | 28 | 2 | 12 | 3 | 12 | 3.56 | ||
| 26 | 81.5 | Memphis | 572 | 31 | 3 | 10.7% | 31 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 12 | -3.88 | ||
| 27 | 81.4 | Middle Tennessee | 559 | 33 | 3 | 11.9% | 36 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 12 | -7.61 | ||
| 28 | 81.0 | Indiana | 451 | 23 | 6 | 8.4% | 33 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 13 | 2.66 | ||
| 29 | 81.0 | USF | 416 | 32 | 2 | 12.0% | 29 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 12 | -2.38 | ||
| 30 | 80.9 | SMU | 524 | 21 | 6 | 6.7% | 44 | 1 | 8 | 11 | 12 | 2.29 | ||
| 31 | 80.7 | Kentucky | 381 | 25 | 2 | 12.6% | 29 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 6.85 | ||
| 32 | 80.6 | Arkansas | 552 | 20 | 0 | 7.1% | 27 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 7.58 | ||
| 33 | 80.6 | LSU | 395 | 23 | 2 | 9.7% | 22 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 | 7.04 | ||
| 34 | 80.5 | Louisville | 440 | 19 | 2 | 7.5% | 25 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 12 | 3.81 | ||
| 35 | 80.4 | Toledo | 469 | 32 | 6 | 13.4% | 37 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 11 | -6.38 | ||
| 36 | 80.4 | Mississippi | 517 | 19 | 3 | 7.4% | 43 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 3.16 | ||
| 37 | 80.2 | Missouri | 484 | 21 | 5 | 7.8% | 42 | 3 | 10 | 6 | 12 | 4.16 | ||
| 38 | 80.0 | Pittsburgh | 440 | 19 | 2 | 6.9% | 20 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 12 | 3.49 | ||
| 39 | 79.9 | Michigan | 400 | 17 | 2 | 7.5% | 31 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 12 | 4.54 | ||
| 40 | 79.9 | Tennessee | 479 | 21 | 6 | 7.4% | 25 | 3 | 12 | 7 | 12 | 3.22 | ||
| 41 | 79.9 | SMU | 460 | 17 | 5 | 6.9% | 42 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 2.29 | ||
| 42 | 79.9 | Tulane | 403 | 28 | 3 | 12.0% | 29 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 13 | -2.15 | ||
| 43 | 79.8 | East Carolina | 389 | 24 | 7 | 10.3% | 39 | 4 | 11 | 9 | 12 | -2.63 | ||
| 44 | 79.7 | San Jose St. | 500 | 28 | 3 | 11.6% | 47 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 12 | -4.05 | ||
| 45 | 79.6 | Virginia Tech | 407 | 18 | 0 | 8.8% | 38 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 12 | 5.83 | ||
| 46 | 79.6 | Houston | 618 | 14 | 1 | 4.6% | 75 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 1.41 | ||
| 47 | 79.5 | Rutgers | 387 | 19 | 3 | 8.9% | 25 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 12 | 5.45 | ||
| 48 | 79.5 | Appalachian St. | 482 | 25 | 2 | 9.3% | 41 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 12 | -5.17 | ||
| 49 | 79.5 | Wake Forest | 461 | 27 | 2 | 10.8% | 29 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 0.87 | ||
| 50 | 79.3 | Wake Forest | 379 | 26 | 2 | 11.5% | 21 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 0.87 |
1–50 of 449
Page 1 of 9
How Defensive Tackle Impact is scored — College DT Impact (DT+) — interior disruption: pressures, sacks, QB hits, tackles for loss and run stops, into a single-number grade.
College Defensive Tackle Impact (DT+) — a single-number season grade from PFN's college model. Toggle Compare to line up two DT seasons. Full methodology →