PFN Impact · 2025 Season
College Offensive Line Impact Rankings
Season
Week
| # | Details | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 99.9 | Missouri | RT | 856 | 7 | 1 | 1.7% | 72 | 62 | 90 | 13 | 4.16 | ||
| 2 | 94.1 | Iowa | LG | 664 | 4 | 0 | 1.3% | 66 | 49 | 86 | 13 | 4.24 | ||
| 3 | 94.0 | Utah | RT | 789 | 5 | 0 | 1.8% | 71 | 59 | 82 | 12 | 3.89 | ||
| 4 | 93.5 | Northwestern | RG | 791 | 6 | 0 | 1.1% | 72 | 48 | 79 | 13 | 4.24 | ||
| 5 | 93.3 | Florida | C | 720 | 4 | 1 | 1.7% | 69 | 42 | 78 | 12 | 6.60 | ||
| 6 | 93.1 | Baylor | RG | 644 | 7 | 0 | 2.1% | 67 | 41 | 82 | 10 | 5.12 | ||
| 7 | 92.8 | Indiana | LT | 926 | 6 | 0 | 2.0% | 70 | 55 | 82 | 15 | 2.66 | ||
| 8 | 92.3 | Miami (FL) | LT | 953 | 15 | 0 | 3.9% | 65 | 51 | 84 | 15 | 3.70 | ||
| 9 | 92.3 | Notre Dame | LG | 418 | 2 | 0 | 1.3% | 76 | 46 | 73 | 7 | 4.39 | ||
| 10 | 92.1 | Michigan St. | C | 697 | 5 | 2 | 1.5% | 68 | 43 | 80 | 11 | 4.14 | ||
| 11 | 91.7 | Oregon | LG | 878 | 5 | 1 | 1.2% | 67 | 47 | 82 | 15 | 3.22 | ||
| 12 | 91.0 | Iowa | LT | 683 | 5 | 0 | 1.9% | 64 | 49 | 82 | 13 | 4.24 | ||
| 13 | 91.0 | Arkansas | LG | 755 | 16 | 1 | 3.7% | 71 | 37 | 71 | 12 | 7.58 | ||
| 14 | 90.9 | Alabama | LT | 953 | 21 | 2 | 3.7% | 65 | 38 | 79 | 15 | 5.29 | ||
| 15 | 90.8 | Duke | RT | 856 | 20 | 3 | 5.3% | 61 | 46 | 85 | 13 | 3.43 | ||
| 16 | 90.7 | Notre Dame | LT | 660 | 9 | 1 | 2.9% | 73 | 43 | 73 | 12 | 4.39 | ||
| 17 | 90.4 | Miami (FL) | RT | 953 | 14 | 2 | 3.6% | 65 | 49 | 81 | 15 | 3.70 | ||
| 18 | 90.2 | Florida | LT | 722 | 17 | 3 | 5.4% | 58 | 44 | 82 | 12 | 6.60 | ||
| 19 | 89.7 | Illinois | LT | 743 | 18 | 3 | 4.9% | 59 | 48 | 82 | 12 | 5.49 | ||
| 20 | 89.6 | Rutgers | C | 809 | 11 | 0 | 3.0% | 74 | 43 | 69 | 12 | 5.45 | ||
| 21 | 89.6 | Penn St. | LG | 600 | 4 | 0 | 1.1% | 69 | 41 | 74 | 11 | 4.81 | ||
| 22 | 89.4 | Iowa | C | 746 | 3 | 1 | 1.2% | 64 | 52 | 79 | 13 | 4.24 | ||
| 23 | 89.2 | Rutgers | RG | 822 | 11 | 1 | 3.3% | 74 | 43 | 68 | 12 | 5.45 | ||
| 24 | 89.2 | Missouri | LT | 719 | 7 | 2 | 2.4% | 70 | 50 | 74 | 11 | 4.16 | ||
| 25 | 89.1 | Texas | LT | 808 | 16 | 3 | 4.6% | 60 | 43 | 82 | 13 | 4.79 | ||
| 26 | 89.0 | Vanderbilt | C | 708 | 19 | 1 | 4.8% | 63 | 35 | 80 | 13 | 3.70 | ||
| 27 | 88.6 | Kentucky | C | 783 | 12 | 0 | 3.7% | 72 | 40 | 67 | 12 | 6.85 | ||
| 28 | 88.6 | Cincinnati | LG | 704 | 11 | 0 | 4.8% | 55 | 42 | 87 | 13 | 3.08 | ||
| 29 | 88.5 | Arkansas | RG | 701 | 13 | 2 | 3.7% | 72 | 33 | 66 | 12 | 7.58 | ||
| 30 | 88.4 | Northwestern | C | 802 | 13 | 1 | 2.9% | 68 | 45 | 74 | 13 | 4.24 | ||
| 31 | 88.1 | Kansas St. | C | 739 | 8 | 0 | 2.8% | 68 | 44 | 74 | 12 | 3.56 | ||
| 32 | 88.0 | Memphis | RT | 733 | 13 | 3 | 3.9% | 70 | 50 | 83 | 11 | -3.88 | ||
| 33 | 87.9 | Iowa | RG | 738 | 10 | 1 | 4.8% | 58 | 53 | 82 | 13 | 4.24 | ||
| 34 | 87.7 | BYU | C | 886 | 10 | 2 | 2.5% | 62 | 49 | 77 | 14 | 4.79 | ||
| 35 | 87.7 | Baylor | C | 788 | 6 | 1 | 1.6% | 71 | 38 | 69 | 11 | 5.12 | ||
| 36 | 87.6 | Syracuse | RT | 780 | 17 | 4 | 4.6% | 66 | 37 | 71 | 12 | 6.79 | ||
| 37 | 87.4 | Kentucky | RG | 782 | 13 | 3 | 3.7% | 67 | 41 | 69 | 12 | 6.85 | ||
| 38 | 87.3 | Rutgers | LT | 727 | 18 | 5 | 5.6% | 64 | 41 | 74 | 12 | 5.45 | ||
| 39 | 87.2 | Iowa St. | C | 812 | 8 | 0 | 2.6% | 72 | 48 | 69 | 12 | 3.74 | ||
| 40 | 87.2 | North Carolina St. | LT | 813 | 13 | 3 | 3.1% | 71 | 37 | 67 | 13 | 5.85 | ||
| 41 | 87.0 | Kansas | RG | 724 | 11 | 0 | 3.9% | 66 | 41 | 73 | 12 | 4.72 | ||
| 42 | 86.8 | North Carolina St. | RG | 337 | 9 | 2 | 4.0% | 69 | 18 | 68 | 10 | 5.85 | ||
| 43 | 86.7 | SMU | RT | 708 | 15 | 2 | 4.3% | 61 | 38 | 80 | 12 | 2.29 | ||
| 44 | 86.6 | South Carolina | LG | 374 | 8 | 3 | 3.1% | 67 | 22 | 66 | 9 | 7.99 | ||
| 45 | 86.6 | Kansas St. | LT | 696 | 16 | 1 | 4.2% | 65 | 42 | 75 | 12 | 3.56 | ||
| 46 | 86.5 | Colorado | C | 774 | 10 | 1 | 2.6% | 69 | 36 | 68 | 12 | 5.74 | ||
| 47 | 86.5 | Boston College | RT | 672 | 20 | 4 | 5.8% | 64 | 35 | 74 | 11 | 4.29 | ||
| 48 | 86.5 | Oklahoma | LT | 653 | 19 | 4 | 6.4% | 63 | 37 | 73 | 11 | 6.10 | ||
| 49 | 86.4 | Army | LG | 861 | 6 | 0 | 0.0% | 62 | 93 | 87 | 13 | -4.21 | ||
| 50 | 86.1 | Houston | LG | 683 | 9 | 0 | 3.3% | 72 | 39 | 70 | 13 | 1.41 |
1–50 of 826
Page 1 of 17
How Offensive Line Impact is scored — College OL Impact (OL+) — snap-weighted pass protection (pressures and sacks allowed) and run blocking, by line position, into a single-number grade.
College Offensive Line Impact (OL+) — a single-number season grade from PFN's college model. Toggle Compare to line up two OL seasons. Full methodology →