PFSN Impact · 2025 Season
NFL Tight End Impact Rankings
Week
| # | Details | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cardinals | 92.4 | 81 | 70 | 170 | 126 | 1,239 | 11 | 63 | 23.9% | 17 | |
| 2 | 49ers | 82.4 | 89 | 85 | 69 | 57 | 628 | 7 | 38 | 19.5% | 11 | |
| 3 | Bears | 81.0 | 85 | 85 | 83 | 58 | 713 | 6 | 36 | 14.7% | 16 | |
| 4 | Packers | 80.9 | 96 | 80 | 44 | 32 | 489 | 6 | 22 | 16.8% | 8 | |
| 5 | Chiefs | 80.6 | 79 | 70 | 109 | 76 | 851 | 5 | 46 | 17.2% | 17 | |
| 6 | Eagles | 80.4 | 81 | 69 | 82 | 60 | 591 | 11 | 34 | 17.6% | 15 | |
| 7 | Patriots | 79.7 | 81 | 70 | 87 | 60 | 768 | 7 | 42 | 15.8% | 17 | |
| 8 | Raiders | 79.0 | 75 | 68 | 87 | 64 | 680 | 7 | 36 | 20.0% | 12 | |
| 9 | Texans | 78.9 | 78 | 80 | 107 | 82 | 777 | 3 | 39 | 17.3% | 17 | |
| 10 | Falcons | 78.6 | 73 | 60 | 119 | 88 | 928 | 5 | 51 | 20.7% | 17 | |
| 11 | Bills | 77.8 | 93 | 80 | 50 | 39 | 571 | 5 | 27 | 13.3% | 12 | |
| 12 | Colts | 77.7 | 71 | 71 | 114 | 76 | 817 | 4 | 42 | 19.6% | 17 | |
| 13 | Saints | 77.5 | 78 | 67 | 102 | 77 | 889 | 3 | 41 | 15.9% | 17 | |
| 14 | Seahawks | 77.2 | 80 | 78 | 68 | 52 | 519 | 6 | 26 | 13.7% | 16 | |
| 15 | Dolphins | 77.0 | 93 | 61 | 35 | 24 | 283 | 6 | 19 | 14.8% | 8 | |
| 16 | Lions | 76.8 | 91 | 81 | 49 | 40 | 489 | 3 | 23 | 16.7% | 9 | |
| 17 | Jaguars | 75.8 | 84 | 91 | 60 | 46 | 540 | 3 | 28 | 14.4% | 12 | |
| 18 | Browns | 75.7 | 67 | 64 | 108 | 72 | 731 | 6 | 32 | 18.5% | 16 | |
| 19 | Cowboys | 74.9 | 72 | 73 | 103 | 82 | 600 | 8 | 30 | 15.7% | 17 | |
| 20 | Steelers | 74.4 | 81 | 72 | 54 | 41 | 486 | 4 | 21 | 10.1% | 15 | |
| 21 | Chargers | 73.7 | 74 | 50 | 69 | 49 | 664 | 3 | 28 | 12.3% | 15 | |
| 22 | Titans | 73.6 | 72 | 50 | 79 | 56 | 560 | 2 | 24 | 12.6% | 17 | |
| 23 | Rams | 72.8 | 74 | 87 | 56 | 43 | 408 | 8 | 24 | 10.7% | 14 | |
| 24 | Bills | 72.3 | 78 | 82 | 50 | 36 | 417 | 4 | 23 | 9.7% | 16 | |
| 25 | Vikings | 72.2 | 73 | 75 | 66 | 51 | 438 | 3 | 22 | 13.4% | 15 | |
| 26 | Commanders | 72.0 | 72 | 70 | 73 | 50 | 504 | 4 | 25 | 17.5% | 13 | |
| 27 | Giants | 72.0 | 70 | 66 | 74 | 45 | 528 | 5 | 25 | 14.6% | 15 | |
| 28 | 49ers | 72.0 | 77 | 89 | 46 | 34 | 293 | 5 | 21 | 12.8% | 9 | |
| 29 | Buccaneers | 72.0 | 67 | 76 | 82 | 59 | 572 | 1 | 25 | 15.4% | 15 | |
| 30 | Dolphins | 71.8 | 83 | 75 | 34 | 26 | 335 | 1 | 14 | 13.5% | 9 | |
| 31 | Rams | 71.4 | 75 | 86 | 36 | 25 | 281 | 3 | 17 | 11.5% | 9 | |
| 32 | Broncos | 70.9 | 68 | 67 | 77 | 50 | 461 | 1 | 19 | 12.5% | 16 | |
| 33 | Steelers | 70.5 | 77 | 90 | 44 | 31 | 364 | 1 | 16 | 10.1% | 13 | |
| 34 | Ravens | 70.5 | 67 | 78 | 70 | 48 | 422 | 5 | 24 | 14.9% | 17 | |
| 35 | Jets | 70.3 | 71 | 71 | 66 | 44 | 369 | 1 | 23 | 15.7% | 13 | |
| 36 | Bears | 70.0 | 75 | 82 | 49 | 30 | 347 | 2 | 17 | 8.7% | 16 | |
| 37 | Bengals | 69.7 | 70 | 71 | 43 | 28 | 307 | 2 | 19 | 9.4% | 12 | |
| 38 | Ravens | 68.9 | 71 | 81 | 36 | 27 | 307 | 1 | 11 | 11.7% | 11 | |
| 39 | Panthers | 68.9 | 74 | 87 | 37 | 27 | 249 | 2 | 10 | 7.5% | 15 | |
| 40 | Packers | 68.4 | 77 | 68 | 31 | 24 | 252 | 0 | 11 | 7.4% | 13 | |
| 41 | Rams | 68.3 | 72 | 83 | 33 | 24 | 208 | 3 | 12 | 6.0% | 15 | |
| 42 | Titans | 68.0 | 68 | 75 | 55 | 44 | 357 | 2 | 17 | 9.3% | 16 | |
| 43 | Panthers | 67.8 | 71 | 76 | 34 | 29 | 190 | 1 | 8 | 9.1% | 11 | |
| 44 | Browns | 67.6 | 64 | 60 | 48 | 33 | 293 | 4 | 11 | 10.8% | 11 | |
| 45 | Steelers | 67.4 | 66 | 63 | 55 | 38 | 222 | 2 | 10 | 9.4% | 17 | |
| 46 | Raiders | 67.1 | 60 | 70 | 50 | 35 | 328 | 1 | 18 | 11.7% | 12 | |
| 47 | Cardinals | 66.2 | 67 | 74 | 37 | 30 | 301 | 0 | 15 | 6.1% | 15 | |
| 48 | Chiefs | 65.1 | 60 | 80 | 38 | 21 | 178 | 0 | 9 | 7.8% | 13 | |
| 49 | Bengals | 64.0 | 56 | 74 | 41 | 34 | 288 | 3 | 13 | 7.7% | 13 |
How Tight End Impact is scored — Uses the same receiving blend as WR — value over replacement, yards, TDs, target share, separation — plus blocking grades from 2019, on a 50–100 scale.
TE Impact — total receiving value (efficiency × volume) + opportunity (target share), rushing excluded; NGS separation / YAC-over-expected added 2016+. Era-adjusted, average qualifying TE = 75. A per-target efficiency grade and a receiving+blocking composite (2006+) are reported alongside. Season-level. Toggle Compare to line up two seasons side by side. Full methodology →