Skip to main content
PFSN Logo

PFSN Impact · 2025 Season

NFL Tight End Impact Rankings

Week
#Details
1Cardinals92.481701701261,239116323.9%17
249ers82.48985695762873819.5%11
3Bears81.08585835871363614.7%16
4Packers80.99680443248962216.8%8
5Chiefs80.679701097685154617.2%17
6Eagles80.481698260591113417.6%15
7Patriots79.78170876076874215.8%17
8Raiders79.07568876468073620.0%12
9Texans78.978801078277733917.3%17
10Falcons78.673601198892855120.7%17
11Bills77.89380503957152713.3%12
12Colts77.771711147681744219.6%17
13Saints77.578671027788934115.9%17
14Seahawks77.28078685251962613.7%16
15Dolphins77.09361352428361914.8%8
16Lions76.89181494048932316.7%9
17Jaguars75.88491604654032814.4%12
18Browns75.767641087273163218.5%16
19Cowboys74.972731038260083015.7%17
20Steelers74.48172544148642110.1%15
21Chargers73.77450694966432812.3%15
22Titans73.67250795656022412.6%17
23Rams72.87487564340882410.7%14
24Bills72.3788250364174239.7%16
25Vikings72.27375665143832213.4%15
26Commanders72.07270735050442517.5%13
27Giants72.07066744552852514.6%15
2849ers72.07789463429352112.8%9
29Buccaneers72.06776825957212515.4%15
30Dolphins71.88375342633511413.5%9
31Rams71.47586362528131711.5%9
32Broncos70.96867775046111912.5%16
33Steelers70.57790443136411610.1%13
34Ravens70.56778704842252414.9%17
35Jets70.37171664436912315.7%13
36Bears70.0758249303472178.7%16
37Bengals69.7707143283072199.4%12
38Ravens68.97181362730711111.7%11
39Panthers68.9748737272492107.5%15
40Packers68.4776831242520117.4%13
41Rams68.3728333242083126.0%15
42Titans68.0687555443572179.3%16
43Panthers67.871763429190189.1%11
44Browns67.66460483329341110.8%11
45Steelers67.4666355382222109.4%17
46Raiders67.16070503532811811.7%12
47Cardinals66.2677437303010156.1%15
48Chiefs65.160803821178097.8%13
49Bengals64.0567441342883137.7%13

How Tight End Impact is scored — Uses the same receiving blend as WR — value over replacement, yards, TDs, target share, separation — plus blocking grades from 2019, on a 50–100 scale.

TE Impact — total receiving value (efficiency × volume) + opportunity (target share), rushing excluded; NGS separation / YAC-over-expected added 2016+. Era-adjusted, average qualifying TE = 75. A per-target efficiency grade and a receiving+blocking composite (2006+) are reported alongside. Season-level. Toggle Compare to line up two seasons side by side. Full methodology →