The Baltimore Ravens begin life after John Harbaugh. The draft could give the Ravens, who have disappointed in recent seasons, an opportunity to reload and reclaim their place as a contender. The AFC is no longer the one-team conference it appeared to be during the Kansas City Chiefs’ recent dominance.
Using PFSN’s 2026 NFL Mock Draft Simulator, we can take a look at what Baltimore could do.
Round 1, Pick 14: Peter Woods, DL, Clemson
Nnamdi Madubuike missed 15 games due to injury, and the defense suffered as a result. Without his disruption up front, the unit ranked No. 18 in PFSN’s NFL Defense Impact Rankings. Peter Woods adds an element that Baltimore needs to return to a high level of success. He can play every position in an odd front. Additionally, he could kick inside and take over at the three-technique or, in some situations, line up as a strongside defensive end.
Round 2, Pick 45: R. Mason Thomas, EDGE, Oklahoma
Under Harbaugh, the Ravens cycled through a host of edge rushers who never truly replaced Terrell Suggs. Mason Thomas, however, bends the corner and closes on the quarterback quickly. The lack of dynamism was evident in the season finale against Pittsburgh, where a quarterback in his 40s picked them apart. When the Ravens are at their best, they win with edge dominance.
Round 3, Pick 80: Eli Stowers, TE, Vanderbilt
Isaiah Likely has supplanted Mark Andrews as the better option at tight end. However, Andrews signed an extension that allows the team to void the remaining years after next season, when he will be 32. If Baltimore re-signs Likely, the team will either rework Andrews’ deal or release him.
Either way, Eli Stowers represents an upgrade over Andrews and provides an athletic improvement over Likely. A former quarterback, Stowers understands route nuance. Moreover, he has the ability to outjump most defenders, and with his long stride, he can pull away in space.
Round 4, Pick 115: Deion Burks, WR, Oklahoma
The back end of the wide receiver room needs an injection of explosiveness and a change of pace. When Lamar Jackson moves the pocket, quicker receivers allow outside wideouts to work back toward him. Deion Burks provides a vertical threat from the slot. As currently constructed, the offense is a slow, methodical unit that relies heavily on Derrick Henry to break long runs.
Round 5, Pick 154: Tomas Rimac, G, Virginia Tech
Despite Daniel Faalele’s immense size, he missed too many blocks and failed to consistently attach and drive defenders off the ball. Baltimore will likely give him at least another year to correct those deficiencies. Tomas Rimac, meanwhile, is not an aesthetically pleasing athlete.
That said, he brings a quick rise out of his stance with violent hands and a powerful punch. Rimac may not be the long-term answer, but the film suggests Faalele may not be, either. Jackson and the run game need consistent trench play.
Round 5, Pick 162: Aaron Anderson, WR, LSU
Inconsistent quarterback play hurt Aaron Anderson’s draft stock. However, his impact in multiple facets should not be underestimated. Like Burks, he can stretch the defense, but he also offers value as a kick returner capable of taking the ball the distance on any touch.
With kickoff rules favoring returns, Anderson could deliver immediate dividends. The Ravens cannot continue winning without maximizing all three phases of the game, and they need a spark in the return game.
Round 5, Pick 174: Trey Zuhn III, G, Texas A&M
Neither Joseph Noteboom nor Carson Vinson should be relied upon in a swing tackle role. If Ronnie Stanley and/or Roger Rosengarten were to leave a game due to injury, Baltimore would struggle to win with its current depth. Trey Zuhn III played in a dynamic rushing attack at Texas A&M and understands effective run blocking. More importantly, his quick feet and lateral movement add value in pass protection.
Round 5, Pick 175: Vincent Anthony, EDGE, Duke
After two Super Bowls, 173 games, and 9,201 snaps, Kyle Van Noy, relative to his salary and role, is no longer a viable option. Fortunately for Baltimore, Van Noy is set to enter free agency, freeing both cap space and a roster spot. Vincent Anthony is a developmental prospect with wingspan and a long first step that allows him to beat blockers around the edge. However, he still needs refinement and added size.
Currently, Anthony fits into the “see ball, get ball” category. That instinct can benefit linebackers, but edge rushers must discipline their eyes. Without refinement, misdirection can pull them out of position and open gaps.
Round 6, Pick 209: Charlie Demmings, CB, Stephen F. Austin
Charlie Demmings is a small-school prospect who profiles as a moldable developmental project with size, speed, and physicality. Behind veterans, he will need reps and time, but the tools are evident.
Beyond Nate Wiggins and Marlon Humphrey, no one on the roster offers the developmental upside teams typically seek at this stage of the draft. Baltimore’s new head coach will want to build depth with a blend of veterans and high-upside prospects.
Round 7, Pick 251: Xavier Nwankpa, S, Iowa
With Kyle Hamilton operating as a nickelback, the Ravens currently deploy three playmakers in the secondary alongside Malaki Starks and Alohi Gilman. The group has performed well overall. Still, a new coaching staff will bring its own vision.
Assistants often look to put their stamp on position groups as a pathway to advancement. Nwankpa is a strong tackler with length, quickness, and a nose for the football, along with the ability to generate turnovers.
Round 7, Pick 255: Jalon Daniels, QB, Kansas
Between Josh Johnson and Tyler Huntley, Baltimore has routinely cycled through backup quarterbacks with skill sets loosely resembling Jackson’s. Why not take a chance on a player with arm strength and explosiveness? Daniels will not replace Jackson, but if the starter were to miss time, Daniels could keep the offense functional through training camp and the preseason while the team waits for Jackson’s return.
