Former NFL reporter Dianna Russini continues to face intense scrutiny after reports surfaced about her alleged relationship with New England Patriots head coach Mike Vrabel, with The Athletic’s internal investigation into her journalistic conduct still ongoing.
Now, NFL insider Mike Florio has criticized how both Russini and The Athletic handled the controversy, arguing that the situation has raised serious questions about transparency, accountability, and journalistic standards.
Why The Athletic’s Early Defense of Dianna Russini Sparked a Media Crisis
In April 2026, Page Six published photos showing Russini and Vrabel together at a resort in Sedona, Arizona. Additional images from 2020 later appeared to show the two kissing in New York City.
The controversy unfolded on multiple fronts. Both individuals were married at the time, raising personal and ethical questions. More significantly, Russini’s role as one of the NFL’s leading insiders prompted concerns about professional boundaries, potential conflicts of interest, and whether the relationship could affect perceptions of her impartiality as a reporter.
According to The New York Times, Russini waited two days before informing her employers after learning the photos were about to surface. More controversially, she reportedly contacted Meredith Kopit Levien, CEO of The New York Times Company, while bypassing her direct supervisors.
BE THE GM OF YOUR FAVORITE TEAM: PFN’s FREE NFL Mock Draft Simulator
Before publishing the story, the New York Post gave The Athletic an opportunity to respond. Steven Ginsberg, the outlet’s executive editor, who had reportedly seen “at least one of the photos,” defended Russini, calling the images “misleading” and saying the interactions had occurred in public.
However, The Times implied that Ginsberg had only seen the photo Russini shared with him. Once the Post published the full set of images, the situation reportedly shifted internally.
Reacting to the latest developments, Florio argued that the episode reflected poorly on both Russini and her employer.
PREDICT THE NFL SEASON: PFN’s FREE NFL Playoff Predictor
“The entire chain of facts, as spelled out in the Times article, is a bad look for both Russini and The Athletic,” Florio wrote. “She waited too long to sound the internal alarm. When she did, she went over the head of her first-line boss. Then, she possibly failed to give her boss all of the photos. For Ginsberg’s part, he took her strong denial at face value. And he did nothing to ensure that he saw all of the photos before vouching for Russini.”
“Then, once Ginsberg saw all of the photos that the Post published, neither Ginsberg nor The Athletic said anything to correct the impression his statement created,” Florio added. “Even though, based on the Times article, seeing all of the photos significantly changed the assessment of Russini’s conduct.”
The Athletic’s internal investigation remains ongoing, while Russini stepped down from her role shortly after the photos became public. Vrabel, meanwhile, continues in his role as the Patriots’ head coach, although he has reportedly sought counseling.
Before the controversy, Russini had built one of the most respected careers in NFL media, rising from local television reporting to become one of the league’s top insiders. Her reputation was built on trusted sourcing, professionalism, and breaking news, but those qualities are now facing their biggest test as the fallout from the controversy continues.
