After advancing to the quarterfinals at the BNP Paribas Open in Indian Wells, Daniil Medvedev addressed the increasingly strict enforcement of the 25-second shot clock and suggested that the system often lacks what he called “tennis common sense.”
The former World No. 1 acknowledged that the rule helps keep matches moving but argued that inconsistent enforcement and overly rigid timing can frustrate players who are trying to recover from long rallies or maintain their routine between points.
Understanding the 25-Second Shot Clock Rule in Professional Tennis
The shot clock was introduced across professional tennis to standardize the pace between points and limit delays. Set at 25 seconds, the timer begins as soon as a point ends and requires the server to start their motion before it expires. In recent years, enforcement has become more automated, leaving umpires with less flexibility to allow extra time following exhausting rallies or when players need to retrieve towels.
Some players have voiced concerns that the rigid countdown fails to account for the physical realities of long matches. World No. 1 Carlos Alcaraz was among those who criticized the rule, arguing that a fixed timer does not always reflect the demands of high-level competition.
Medvedev shared his own perspective during a post-match press conference after reaching the quarterfinals at Indian Wells. The Russian is playing the tournament for the ninth time and arrived as the No. 11 seed. After receiving a first-round bye, he advanced with straight-set wins over Alejandro Tabilo, Sebastian Baez, and Alex Michelsen to reach his fourth quarterfinal at the event.
How Does Daniil Medvedev Feel About the Way Time Violations Are Given During Matches?
When asked about the shot clock and whether he personally finds it difficult to manage, Medvedev acknowledged that the timer feels faster than before. “So it is fast now,” he said. “But some players do, how you say, abuse it by, like, it’s two seconds and they go, like, Oh, my toss went away or something.”
Medvedev was also asked whether different umpires handle the rule differently. He said that inconsistency can be a problem and pointed to specific experiences with chair umpire Fergus Murphy. “Yeah, I think so,” Medvedev said.
“I think Fergus [Murphy] gave me two or three times in my life a time violation and I always went nuts. Because sometimes you play Rafa, you play, I don’t know, Sascha takes, Novak takes some time to prepare for serve. And of course you play them sometimes with a different umpire.”
ALSO READ: Daniil Medvedev Discloses the Truth About His Dubai Ordeal After Safely Reaching Indian Wells
He added that he would like to see the rule applied evenly across players. “But I would love to see Fergus. I cannot play Rafa anymore, but if he would make, like, 10 times time violation to Rafa, because you need to have some common sense sometimes, which maybe you should.”
Looking ahead, the Russian tennis star will take on either five-time Champion Novak Djokovic or Defending champion Jack Draper in the quarterfinals.
